Matsuya Sushi vs Yeti— Menu Price Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of menu prices, 2 shared items, average cost, and ratings to help you decide which restaurant is the better value. Updated August 2026.

Matsuya Sushi vs Yeti — Key Takeaways

At-a-glance restaurant comparison data for price-conscious diners

Better Value

Yeti

Shared Items

2

Avg Price Gap

$1.07

Top Rated

Yeti

Price analysis: Matsuya Sushi averages $8.57 per item while Yeti averages $7.5, making Yeti approximately $1.07 cheaper per item on average.

Shared food categories:

japanese

Menu Item Price Comparison

2 items

Shared menu items ranked by largest price difference between Matsuya Sushi and Yeti

# Menu Item Matsuya Sushi Yeti Price Gap
1 White Tuna $2.75 $2.00 $0.75
2 Smoked Salmon $2.75 $2.50 $0.25

Matsuya Sushi vs Yeti — Which Should You Choose?

When comparing Matsuya Sushi and Yeti menu prices, several factors come into play beyond just the per-item cost. Both restaurants share 1 food category (japanese), making them direct alternatives for diners deciding where to eat.

Yeti is the better value pick when looking at average menu item pricing. With Matsuya Sushi averaging $8.57 per item and Yeti at $7.5, the price difference of $1.07 per item can add up over multiple orders — especially for families or groups.

We track 205 menu items at Matsuya Sushi and 151 items at Yeti, with 2 items appearing on both menus under the same name. This overlap lets you directly compare identical items to see which restaurant charges less.

Looking at ratings, Yeti leads with Matsuya Sushi scoring 3/5 versus Yeti at 4/5. While price matters, the overall dining experience and food quality reflected in these ratings are equally important factors in choosing between these two restaurants.

Similar Binge-Worthy Restaurants

If you like Matsuya Sushi and Yeti, compare these next

More pairs →

Matsuya Sushi vs Yeti — Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing these two restaurants on price, menu, and value

Is Matsuya Sushi or Yeti cheaper?

Based on current menu data, Yeti offers better average value. Matsuya Sushi averages $8.57 per item while Yeti averages $7.5 per item. For the full ranked price list, see Matsuya Sushi cheapest items and Yeti cheapest items.

Which restaurant has a bigger menu — Matsuya Sushi or Yeti?

Matsuya Sushi has the larger menu with 205 items tracked compared to Yeti's 151 items. Between them, there are 2 shared items with the same name, plus 203 items unique to Matsuya Sushi and 149 exclusive to Yeti.

How many menu items do Matsuya Sushi and Yeti share?

Matsuya Sushi and Yeti have 2 overlapping menu items that appear on both menus under the same name. Matsuya Sushi has 203 exclusive items and Yeti has 149 items not found at the other restaurant. The table above shows the biggest price gaps between identical items at each location.

Which has a better customer rating — Matsuya Sushi or Yeti?

Yeti leads on customer satisfaction with a rating of 4/5, compared to 3/5 for Matsuya Sushi. When choosing based purely on quality, Yeti has the edge — though both restaurants serve the same broad customer base.

What type of food do Matsuya Sushi and Yeti serve?

Both restaurants serve japanese. They share 1 food category, which makes them genuine alternatives for the same dining cravings. If you're looking for the best value within these categories, compare average prices in the key takeaways section above.

Where can I find the cheapest items at Matsuya Sushi and Yeti?

For budget-friendly meals, check our dedicated cheap eats guides: the Matsuya Sushi cheapest menu items guide lists every item ranked by price from lowest to highest (average $8.57). The Yeti cheapest menu items guide does the same (average $7.5). Both are updated August 2026.

How much can I save by choosing Yeti over Matsuya Sushi?

Choosing Yeti saves you approximately $1.07 per menu item on average. For a typical meal of 3–4 items, that adds up to roughly $3.75 in savings — meaningful for budget-conscious families or regular diners. Across a month of weekly visits, the cost difference can reach $15 or more.