In 2010
Items
81
Avg Price
$8.09
Rating
4/5
Unique Items
59
Side-by-side comparison of menu prices, 22 shared items, average cost, and ratings to help you decide which restaurant is the better value. Updated August 2026.
Items
81
Avg Price
$8.09
Rating
4/5
Unique Items
59
Items
194
Avg Price
$11.82
Rating
3/5
Unique Items
172
At-a-glance restaurant comparison data for price-conscious diners
Better Value
In 2010
Shared Items
22
Avg Price Gap
$3.73
Top Rated
In 2010
Shared food categories:
Shared menu items ranked by largest price difference between In 2010 and MOMO
| # | Menu Item | In 2010 | MOMO | Price Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shrimp | $2.50 | $24.00 | $-21.50 |
| 2 | Scallop | $3.00 | $24.00 | $-21.00 |
| 3 | White Tuna | $3.00 | $23.00 | $-20.00 |
| 4 | Salmon | $6.00 | $23.00 | $-17.00 |
| 5 | Tuna | $6.00 | $12.00 | $-6.00 |
| 6 | Eel | $5.00 | $2.00 | $3.00 |
| 7 | Tiger Roll | $12.00 | $10.00 | $2.00 |
| 8 | Sashimi Dinner | $20.00 | $18.00 | $2.00 |
| 9 | Smoked Salmon | $3.00 | $2.00 | $1.00 |
| 10 | Yellowtail | $3.00 | $2.00 | $1.00 |
| 11 | Masago | $3.00 | $2.00 | $1.00 |
| 12 | Salmon Skin | $4.00 | $5.00 | $-1.00 |
| 13 | Calamari | $6.00 | $5.00 | $1.00 |
| 14 | Sushi Dinner | $19.00 | $18.00 | $1.00 |
| 15 | Fluke | $2.50 | $2.00 | $0.50 |
| 16 | Striped Bass | $2.50 | $2.00 | $0.50 |
| 17 | Mackerel | $2.50 | $2.00 | $0.50 |
| 18 | Octopus | $2.50 | $2.00 | $0.50 |
| 19 | Squid | $2.50 | $2.00 | $0.50 |
| 20 | Spicy Tuna * | $3.50 | $3.00 | $0.50 |
When comparing In 2010 and MOMO menu prices, several factors come into play beyond just the per-item cost. Both restaurants share 2 food categories (japanese, sushi), making them direct alternatives for diners deciding where to eat.
In 2010 is the better value pick when looking at average menu item pricing. With In 2010 averaging $8.09 per item and MOMO at $11.82, the price difference of $3.73 per item can add up over multiple orders — especially for families or groups.
We track 81 menu items at In 2010 and 194 items at MOMO, with 22 items appearing on both menus under the same name. This overlap lets you directly compare identical items to see which restaurant charges less.
Looking at ratings, In 2010 leads with In 2010 scoring 4/5 versus MOMO at 3/5. While price matters, the overall dining experience and food quality reflected in these ratings are equally important factors in choosing between these two restaurants.
If you like In 2010 and MOMO, compare these next
Common questions about comparing these two restaurants on price, menu, and value