Skip to content
U
Ume No Hana
VS
W
W

Ume No Hana vs W— Menu Price Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of menu prices, 1 shared items, average cost, and ratings to help you decide which restaurant is the better value. Updated August 2026.

Ume No Hana vs W — Key Takeaways

At-a-glance restaurant comparison data for price-conscious diners

Better Value

Ume No Hana

Shared Items

1

Avg Price Gap

$2.48

Top Rated

W

Price analysis: W averages $11.87 per item while Ume No Hana averages $9.39, making Ume No Hana approximately $2.48 cheaper per item on average.

Shared food categories:

sushi

Menu Item Price Comparison

1 items

Shared menu items ranked by largest price difference between Ume No Hana and W

# Menu Item Ume No Hana W Price Gap
1 Vegetable — $2.25 $-2.25

Ume No Hana vs W — Which Should You Choose?

When comparing Ume No Hana and W menu prices, several factors come into play beyond just the per-item cost. Both restaurants share 1 food category (sushi), making them direct alternatives for diners deciding where to eat.

Ume No Hana is the better value pick when looking at average menu item pricing. With Ume No Hana averaging $9.39 per item and W at $11.87, the price difference of $2.48 per item can add up over multiple orders — especially for families or groups.

We track 239 menu items at Ume No Hana and 194 items at W, with 1 items appearing on both menus under the same name. This overlap lets you directly compare identical items to see which restaurant charges less.

Looking at ratings, W leads with Ume No Hana scoring 3/5 versus W at 4/5. While price matters, the overall dining experience and food quality reflected in these ratings are equally important factors in choosing between these two restaurants.

Similar Binge-Worthy Restaurants

If you like Ume No Hana and W, compare these next

More pairs →
L

Lobster King

chinese
C

Chinese Food

chinese
Y

Yeti

japanese
G

Grill House

mediterranean

Ume No Hana vs W — Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about comparing these two restaurants on price, menu, and value

Is Ume No Hana or W cheaper?
Based on current menu data, Ume No Hana offers better average value. Ume No Hana averages $9.39 per item while W averages $11.87 per item. For the full ranked price list, see Ume No Hana cheapest items and W cheapest items.

Which restaurant has a bigger menu — Ume No Hana or W?
Ume No Hana has the larger menu with 239 items tracked compared to W's 194 items. Between them, there are 1 shared items with the same name, plus 238 items unique to Ume No Hana and 193 exclusive to W.

How many menu items do Ume No Hana and W share?
Ume No Hana and W have 1 overlapping menu items that appear on both menus under the same name. Ume No Hana has 238 exclusive items and W has 193 items not found at the other restaurant. The table above shows the biggest price gaps between identical items at each location.

Which has a better customer rating — Ume No Hana or W?
W leads on customer satisfaction with a rating of 4/5, compared to 3/5 for Ume No Hana. When choosing based purely on quality, W has the edge — though both restaurants serve the same broad customer base.

What type of food do Ume No Hana and W serve?
Both restaurants serve sushi. They share 1 food category, which makes them genuine alternatives for the same dining cravings. If you're looking for the best value within these categories, compare average prices in the key takeaways section above.

Where can I find the cheapest items at Ume No Hana and W?
For budget-friendly meals, check our dedicated cheap eats guides: the Ume No Hana cheapest menu items guide lists every item ranked by price from lowest to highest (average $9.39). The W cheapest menu items guide does the same (average $11.87). Both are updated August 2026.

How much can I save by choosing Ume No Hana over W?
Choosing Ume No Hana saves you approximately $2.48 per menu item on average. For a typical meal of 3–4 items, that adds up to roughly $8.68 in savings — meaningful for budget-conscious families or regular diners. Across a month of weekly visits, the cost difference can reach $35 or more.